<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shiv Puran and Big Bang</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zhagdoo.com/2009/10/11/shiv-puran-and-big-bang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zhagdoo.com/2009/10/11/shiv-puran-and-big-bang/</link>
	<description>Just Another View Point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 09:04:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vaibhav</title>
		<link>http://www.zhagdoo.com/2009/10/11/shiv-puran-and-big-bang/comment-page-1/#comment-1975</link>
		<dc:creator>vaibhav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zhagdoo.com/?p=627#comment-1975</guid>
		<description>In an air tight box, a stone will be a dead stone, a tree will be dead tree, a man will be a dead man. What else you expect it to turn into? All am saying it is not scientifically proven that stones have life, but it is one theory about which we can have an elaborate discussion. before scientifically establishing that trees have life, it was equally absurd. . . . . . . . . . 

As per Oxford: Mythology - myths collectively. . . . Cambridge: Mythology - myths in general. . . . Websters: Mythology - body of myths . . . . . . 

The whole point of my post is these scriptures are not just mythological writings; there is huge amount of knowledge present in them and are better then any modern textbook. . . . . 

Now am explaining it again in a comment, clearly shows I failed in driving the point across. May be next time :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an air tight box, a stone will be a dead stone, a tree will be dead tree, a man will be a dead man. What else you expect it to turn into? All am saying it is not scientifically proven that stones have life, but it is one theory about which we can have an elaborate discussion. before scientifically establishing that trees have life, it was equally absurd. . . . . . . . . . </p>
<p>As per Oxford: Mythology &#8211; myths collectively. . . . Cambridge: Mythology &#8211; myths in general. . . . Websters: Mythology &#8211; body of myths . . . . . . </p>
<p>The whole point of my post is these scriptures are not just mythological writings; there is huge amount of knowledge present in them and are better then any modern textbook. . . . . </p>
<p>Now am explaining it again in a comment, clearly shows I failed in driving the point across. May be next time <img src='http://www.zhagdoo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GAurav Jain</title>
		<link>http://www.zhagdoo.com/2009/10/11/shiv-puran-and-big-bang/comment-page-1/#comment-1973</link>
		<dc:creator>GAurav Jain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zhagdoo.com/?p=627#comment-1973</guid>
		<description>whatever you write makes sense, i.e. we can somehow relate the things excert your &#039;breathing stone&#039; thing, put a stone in an airtight box, it will still be a stone (or a &#039;dead stone&#039; according to you!!).
and ya sure we should use our scriptures as source of knowledge, but they still are what they are , MYTHOLOGY. (no offense.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whatever you write makes sense, i.e. we can somehow relate the things excert your &#8216;breathing stone&#8217; thing, put a stone in an airtight box, it will still be a stone (or a &#8216;dead stone&#8217; according to you!!).<br />
and ya sure we should use our scriptures as source of knowledge, but they still are what they are , MYTHOLOGY. (no offense.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

